|
Post by BlackhawksGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 11, 2012 8:33:33 GMT -5
It's a fine idea but people have already done trades assuming that people were going to require a tag. If no one had an issue with that then maybe we could do it
|
|
|
Post by KingsGM on Mar 12, 2012 8:26:04 GMT -5
It's a fine idea but people have already done trades assuming that people were going to require a tag. If no one had an issue with that then maybe we could do it I think it's the opposite actually...almost to a GM, most of the response during the discussion seems to have been to incorporate the natural contractual cycle of the NHL. Similar to roster allowances, I don't see the need to go over ground already covered...we'd simply continue with the improved rule enhancement.
|
|
|
Post by BlackhawksGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 12, 2012 8:33:46 GMT -5
True but most people haven't yet commented
|
|