|
|
Post by SabresGM on Mar 14, 2012 16:44:32 GMT -5
U know eveyone gets their panties tied in a not everytime there is a trade rejected...Then dont make stupid trades..Flyers has made 2 in a row and now is desperate for a goalie so he is throwing 2 Elite forwards for a # 1 goalie not even close oh i forgot Regehr is in the trade.. Staal or Giroux for Miller is more realistic but not both..And Sabres yes why throw in more than u have too..I agree with that..But u got too be honest here Sabres u could have atleast thrown in a high pick or Spec or anything cause there apparently are some guys that dont know how too value players..So cant just rape them. Yeah I agree I knew I was getting too good of a deal and I probably should have included some picks or prospects. Also since most seem to agree that Giroux for Miller is fair is it possible to get that part of the deal approved. The cap numbers don't work out for Flyers right now but I would be willing to take on the excess cap if worse came to worse and we weren't able to work out the other aspects of the deal. |
|
BluesGM
AHL
Trade Council Member
Posts: 144
|
Post by BluesGM on Mar 14, 2012 16:45:33 GMT -5
Cool
|
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 16:48:45 GMT -5
well you need to rework with flyers. i do think giroux for miller might not be the fairest trade. Giroux is veryy young and has SO much potential and miller is 31 and aging.... Maybe Staal plus a bit for miller would be more fair
|
|
BluesGM
AHL
Trade Council Member
Posts: 144
|
Post by BluesGM on Mar 14, 2012 16:55:41 GMT -5
Exactly
|
|
|
|
Post by BlackhawksGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 17:32:11 GMT -5
Can we just let them do negotiating themselves? This trade isnt even vetoed yet too
|
|
BluesGM
AHL
Trade Council Member
Posts: 144
|
Post by BluesGM on Mar 14, 2012 18:26:41 GMT -5
2 vetos and anyone that commented pretty much stated too re work out the deal so definatley hasnt been any straight out approves.. It aint gonna get passed as is and if so then why have a trade council... We can make it bush league and every trade passes..That would be lots of fun..LOL  |
|
|
|
Post by BlackhawksGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 18:42:21 GMT -5
...thanks for the snarky comment but your point is irrelevant. Where on earth did I say it would go through?
|
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 18:44:31 GMT -5
hahaha
|
|
|
|
Post by FlyersGM on Mar 14, 2012 18:50:13 GMT -5
we're already working to improve the deal, so when it gets vetoed we will have a fresh trade ready for you guys
|
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 18:51:20 GMT -5
ok
|
|
|
|
Post by FlyersGM on Mar 14, 2012 19:20:49 GMT -5
the trade talks r complete, we're just waiting for this to become a vetoed trade, then we will post
|
|
BluesGM
AHL
Trade Council Member
Posts: 144
|
Post by BluesGM on Mar 14, 2012 20:29:28 GMT -5
I dont give a **** Hawks!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 15, 2012 8:29:20 GMT -5
Turny chill
|
|
|
|
Post by BlackhawksGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 15, 2012 8:56:38 GMT -5
What is wrong with you lol
|
|
|
|
Post by MapleLeafsGM on Mar 15, 2012 16:07:04 GMT -5
Yeah I think that deserves a warning...
|
|
