|
Post by SabresGM on Mar 13, 2012 21:18:54 GMT -5
To Sabres:
Giroux 3.8M Staal 8.2M
To Flyers:
Miller 6.3M Regehr 4.0M
|
|
|
Post by FlyersGM on Mar 13, 2012 21:23:54 GMT -5
i accept, Miller fills the need at goalie, i have a lot of forwards, so i figure i can get rid of one to get a goalie I accept
|
|
BluesGM
AHL
Trade Council Member
Posts: 144
|
Post by BluesGM on Mar 13, 2012 21:28:48 GMT -5
This isnt even close... Giroux & Staal are elite forwards and yah Miller is a elite goalie but Regehr is Defensive D man that dont do much..No way it would cost 2 players like that for Miller and even with Regehr thrown in... I cant vote yes for this deal.
VETO
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 13, 2012 22:03:43 GMT -5
veto, giroux is an elite lpayer and so is staal. Sure goalies are worth so much in this league but that is too much for miller. please rework for a better deal.
|
|
|
Post by BlackhawksGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 8:52:39 GMT -5
I dont think this trade is too far off, the way I see it giroux=miller so sabres should add the difference between regehr and staal
|
|
|
Post by chocolatemuffin on Mar 14, 2012 9:38:00 GMT -5
I agree with the Blackhawks giroux=miller. Staal does not equal reghr. Maybe re-work it a little bit.
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 10:49:50 GMT -5
you mean reghr does not equal staal
|
|
|
Post by WildGM on Mar 14, 2012 11:24:14 GMT -5
Just a suggestion. I think adding a 1st plus two high end prospects is sufficient
Sent from my Nexus S using ProBoards
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 13:20:02 GMT -5
please dont post suggestions in trades. I know you are new but since there has been many arguments while non trade council members comment on trades there is no posting on other trades
|
|
|
Post by DevilsGM on Mar 14, 2012 14:05:37 GMT -5
I don't think this trade benefits either team especially. Flyers lose a lot of offense and the sabers lose a starting goalie. I would like to see more of the reasoning for both teams
|
|
|
Post by SabresGM on Mar 14, 2012 15:02:01 GMT -5
Well Devils my reason for doing the trade was it was a chance for me to get Giroux and to move Regehr, who I've been trying to move for a while. I felt I was getting a nice return even though I was losing a starting goalie in Miller.
Also in regards to the trade being vetoed I have no problem with reworking the trade to include some prospects and picks, however Flyers never asked for any so I don't really feel it's my job to offer more than he is asking for. Also although I don't really see this trade as fair I feel a bit like vetoes are being missused since this trade doesn't really ruin either teams by any extent. The Flyers aren't really that much worse losing Giroux and Staal since he is filling in positions that he needs since he only has 3 defensemen and no goalies. This deal also puts him under the cap which he is currently over by 0.5M. This deal also doesn't make my team unbeatable by any means since it leaves me with out a legit starting goalie even though I think Enroth has starter potential.
|
|
|
Post by chocolatemuffin on Mar 14, 2012 15:21:15 GMT -5
you mean reghr does not equal staal Ya sorry didn't see that mistake.
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 15:26:06 GMT -5
sabres i understand you reasoning but it IS too much. giroux has proven himself as a top 5 forward not to mention how young he is and how much better he will get.... Staal is also great but is having a down year. It doesn't matter if he asked for more... it is too much for miller even though he is a great goalie.
|
|
BluesGM
AHL
Trade Council Member
Posts: 144
|
Post by BluesGM on Mar 14, 2012 16:19:28 GMT -5
U know eveyone gets their panties tied in a not everytime there is a trade rejected...Then dont make stupid trades..Flyers has made 2 in a row and now is desperate for a goalie so he is throwing 2 Elite forwards for a # 1 goalie not even close oh i forgot Regehr is in the trade.. Staal or Giroux for Miller is more realistic but not both..And Sabres yes why throw in more than u have too..I agree with that..But u got too be honest here Sabres u could have atleast thrown in a high pick or Spec or anything cause there apparently are some guys that dont know how too value players..So cant just rape them.
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM(Co-Commish) on Mar 14, 2012 16:22:14 GMT -5
That is why it is going to get veto'd and they will have to rework....
|
|